Legal Opinion

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 24, 2017No. 01-16-00330-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Michael Massengale, Justice

A jury convicted appellant Derrick Morris of assault on a family member as a second offense.1 During the jury’s deliberation on punishment, Morris moved for a mistrial, alleging that the State failed to disclose exculpatory material during the punishment phase of trial in violation of Brady v. Maryland.2 The trial court denied this motion. The jury found enhancement allegations to be true and assessed a 50-year prison term as punishment.3

On appeal, Morris raises two issues, solely challenging the outcome of the punishment phase of trial. First, he contends…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael Jerome Boyd v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2018
  2. Raul Requena-Castaneda v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2018
  3. Shawn Douglas Risener v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API