Wright v. Osborne
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment for defendant in this action arising out of a motor vehicle accident. They assign error to the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs did not perfect service on defendant personally or on the Motor Vehicles Division (MVD) within the two-year limitation period of ORS 12.110(1). We affirm.
Plaintiffs agree that they did not accomplish service within the limitation period. They alleged, however, that defendant was absent “from the state during the period following the accident.” Plaintiffs contend that the statute…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Kilminster v. Day Management Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Whittington v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Mitchem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Mitchem v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. GileCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Herzberg v. Moseley Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Knappenberger v. Davis-StantonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015