Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bartos v. United States District Court

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 17, 1927No. 7561Published

1ConcurrenceTrieber, District Judge

I concur in the reversal as announced by Judge LEWIS, but not in all the reasons expressed in his opinion. I fully concur in the concurring opinion of Judge KENTON, and only wish to add to his opinion that it is unnecessary to discuss in this case what constitutes moral turpitude.

In my opinion no person should be en*732rolled as an attorney, who knowingly violates, not only a law of the nation, but also a constitutional provision. A person who commits such an offense is not, in my opinion, a man of such moral character as one desiring to become a member of the legal profession should be, as is so…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. McClaughertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. In re WoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. People ex rel. Maupin v. KeeganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. People ex rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API