Legal Opinion

Wood v. Raydure

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886Published

Appeal from an order of the Allegany Special Term, directing judgment- against the defendant Raydure, upon the ground that his answer was frivolous.

1Opinion of the Court

Haight, J.:

This action was brought to recover the amount of a promissory note alleged to have been made by the defendants, who were copartners, and also for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to them as such. The defendant Raydure answers separately and admits that the defendants were copartners at the time stated in the complaint, doing business under the firm name of Watson & Raydure, and that the plaintiffs were copartners doing business under the firm name of Wood & Thomas, and then upon information and belief he denies each and every allegation of the complaint.

The only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacLay v. SandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Clark v. DillonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882
  3. Ledgerwood Manufacturing Co. v. BairdThe Superior Court of New York City · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API