Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Jackson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1978Published

1DissentJasen, J.

The majority holds that absent exigent circumstances a probation officer may not search the personal property of a probationer without a prior judicial determination that reasonable cause exists to believe that the probationer has violated the terms of his probation. With this conclusion I cannot agree and must, therefore, respectfully dissent.

There is no dispute that a probationer, like a parolee, does not upon the acquisition of probationary status relinquish all constitutionally guaranteed rights. (See Gagnon v Scarpelli, 411 US 778; Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471.) His right to be free…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. United States Ex Rel. Randazzo v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
  5. People v. FortunatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API