People v. Jackson
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentJasen, J.
The majority holds that absent exigent circumstances a probation officer may not search the personal property of a probationer without a prior judicial determination that reasonable cause exists to believe that the probationer has violated the terms of his probation. With this conclusion I cannot agree and must, therefore, respectfully dissent.
There is no dispute that a probationer, like a parolee, does not upon the acquisition of probationary status relinquish all constitutionally guaranteed rights. (See Gagnon v Scarpelli, 411 US 778; Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471.) His right to be free…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States Ex Rel. Randazzo v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- People v. FortunatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.