Legal Opinion
Federal Power Commission v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 10, 1947No. 543PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Judgment reversed on the ground that respondent has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 *803U. S. 41; Macauley v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 327 U. S. 540.
Howard E. Wahrenbrock argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Washington, Robert L. Stern, Lambert McAllister and Louis W. McKernan. A. J. G. Priest argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were P. A. Lasley, Sidman I. Barber and B. H. Dewey, Jr. By special leave of Court, Wyatt Cleveland Holland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
3Cited by26 opinions
- Swift & Company v. WickhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Ecology Action and Suzanne Weber v. United States Atomic Energy Commission, and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Home Loan Bank Board v. Mallonee Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Safir v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- The Federal Trade Commission v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.