In re Autry
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Dissent
Judge John
dissenting.
I believe Judge Tucker had authority both (1) to place legal and physical custody of Dylan Autry (Dylan) with the Willie M. Services Section, a Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services within the North Carolina Department of Human Resources (the Section); and (2) to order the Section to arrange placement of Dylan in a living environment consistent with the criteria set forth in Judge Barefoot’s earlier 18 February 1993 order.
*269The record reflects Dylan was adjudicated a dependent juvenile and custody was granted to the New Hanover…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Loeb v. LoebCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Matter of JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- L. Harvey and Son Co. v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Matter of SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- Hagan v. Peden Steel Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.