Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Autry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1994No. 935DC920Published

1Dissent

Judge John

dissenting.

I believe Judge Tucker had authority both (1) to place legal and physical custody of Dylan Autry (Dylan) with the Willie M. Services Section, a Division of Mental Health, Developmental Disabilities and Substance Abuse Services within the North Carolina Department of Human Resources (the Section); and (2) to order the Section to arrange placement of Dylan in a living environment consistent with the criteria set forth in Judge Barefoot’s earlier 18 February 1993 order.

*269The record reflects Dylan was adjudicated a dependent juvenile and custody was granted to the New Hanover…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Matter of JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. L. Harvey and Son Co. v. JarmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Matter of SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Hagan v. Peden Steel Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API