Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Brewery

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order modified by providing for a denial of the motion so far as it relates to the defendant Gerhard Lang Brewery and by limiting the bill of particulars as to defendants Sugarman to the matter of improvements, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: In view of the separate defense of adverse possession pleaded by the defendant Gerhard Lang Brewery, we conclude that plaintiff is entitled to the particulars which it has demanded including those which relate to improvements. (Rustin v. Rustin, 228 App. Div. 839; Gubner v. Pillion, 231 id. 857. See, also,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rustin v. RustinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API