Legal Opinion

Welch v. Kearns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, C.J.

The question for determination is whether in a civil action or special proceeding wherein a Commissioner is appointed to sell land, such commissioner’s fee is to be determined pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 1-408 or G.S. 28-170.

In the case of Ray v. Banks, 120 N.C. 389, 27 S.E. 28, this Court held the compensation to a commissioner for making a partition sale was governed by Section 1910 of the Code of 1883. This section read as follows: “In sales of real estate under this chapter, the allowance for services in making sale and title, to the officer or person appointed to sell, shall be as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williamson v. . BittingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. Edwards v. Western Land & Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Ray v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Becker County Sand & Gravel Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Goodson v. GoodsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Welch v. KearnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API