Legal Opinion
In Re Welfare of Zink
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 8, 1963No. 38,670PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the juvenile court denying the putative father’s motion for a new hearing in a proceeding to terminate parental rights pursuant to Minn. St. 260.221.
The essential facts taken from the affidavits and transcript of the testimony establish the following: Baby Boy Zink is an illegitimate child bom on July 3, 1961, to Mrs. Audrey Zink, aged 40, who, it is established, had lived apart from her husband, Robert Zink, for some time prior to the birth. There is no question that Robert Zink is not the father of the child. When the baby was a little…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sherman v. Bureau of Catholic CharitiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- In Re Welfare of ShadySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
3Cited by16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Lewis v. Lutheran Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- In Re the Termination of Parental Rights of P.A.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re BrennanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- In Re Welfare of ZinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- In Re Welfare of LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.