Kramer Bros. v. McPherson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.
Does the evidence offered by plaintiff in the trial below, as set forth in the case on appeal, taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, make a case for the jury for violation of the sale in *358bulk statute, G.S. 39-23? In view of the language of the statute, and decided cases in this State, this Court is of opinion that the evidence does make out such a case, and so holds.
The statute, G.S. 39-23, declares that the “sale in bulk of a large part or the whole of a stock of merchandise, otherwise than in the ordinary course of trade and in regular and usual prosecution of the seller’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Swift Co. v. . TempelosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Gallup & Co. v. RozierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Pennell v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Raleigh Tire & Rubber Co. v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Armfield Co. v. . SaleebySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Armfield Co. v. . SaleebySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919