Legal Opinion

American Samoa Government v. Pu'aa

High Court of American Samoa

Decided November 22, 1996No. CR No. 29-96; CR No. 30-96Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order Denying Motions To Sever, Surpress Evidence and Change Venue, and Concerning Jury Voir Dire:

On October 15, 1996, defendant Ricky Pu'aa ("Pu'aa") moved to sever the trial, suppress his statements, suppress all evidence seized, and change venue or permit extensive voir dire of prospective jurors by the court and counsel or the court. On October 23, 1996, defendant Poe Faumuina ("Faumuina") moved for attorney conducted voir dire after the court's inquiries to the jurors. We heard all motions on November 6, 1996. All counsel were present. Pu'aa was also present, and Faumuina waived his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. KopitukCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Houshang SheikhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Southwest Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. Internacional De Aceros, S.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API