Legal Opinion

Khorami v. Gizmo Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 9, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order *471of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated April 1, 1996, which granted the motion for summary judgment by the defendants Gizmo Cab Corp. and Bernard Bazile and the cross motion for summary judgment by the defendants Hyunsoo Han and II Young Kim, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

There is an issue of fact…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Washington v. Mercy Home for ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Schwartz v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Risbrook v. Coronamos Cab Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API