Legal Opinion

Charles Betcher Lumber Co. v. Devenney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 1, 1901No. Nos. 12,679—(29)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Traverse county, Steidl, J., denying a motion for judgment in her favor notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.

1Per curiam

Action to recover $72.39 and interest for lumber alleged to have been sold by the plaintiff to the defendant. Verdict for the plaintiff for the amount claimed, and the defendant appealed from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial.

The first alleged error to be considered is that the trial court erred in not dismissing the case for the reason that the evidence was not sufficient to justify a verdict against the defendant.

It is a conceded fact that the defendant personally never had anything to do with the alleged purchase of the lumber, but…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cain v. MeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Rahm v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API