Legal Opinion

Horejs v. American Plumbing & Steam Supply Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1931No. 22875. Department OnePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

By this action, the plaintiffs sought to have a receiver appointed for a solvent corporation. To the amended complaint (which will be referred to as the complaint), a demurrer was interposed and sustained. The plaintiffs refused to plead further, and elected to stand upon their complaint. Judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which they appeal.

The complaint is too long to be set out here in full, and we will therefore undertake to briefly state only what appear to us to be the essential facts alleged therein.

In the spring of 1919, the appellants, with the respondent Joe L. Long,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Reed v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Bergman Clay Manufacturing Co. v. M. L. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Alabama Coal & Coke Co. v. ShackelfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  5. Schaffhauser v. Arnholt & Schaefer Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bryan v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Glasier v. GlasierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Snyder v. Yakima Finance CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API