Legal Opinion

American Reliance Insurance Co. v. Martinez

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 6, 1996No. 95-3039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

American Reliance Insurance Company appeals a final judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict. We affirm the judgment find*576ing that, based on competent substantial evidence, the jury was entitled to determine that the Martinezes’ unilateral actions were insufficient to effectuate a cancellation of the American Reliance policy, Dedmon v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 408 So.2d 822 (Fla. 3d DCA1982), and to determine further that American Reliance breached the insurance contract. Cf. Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 463 So.2d 1153 (Fla.l985)(jury can determine whether facts of ease fall within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. FIRST STATE INS.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. Dedmon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kathleen Miller v. Scottsdale Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Miller v. Scottsdale Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API