Southeastern Air Service Inc. v. Carter

No further discussion of headnote 1 is necessary.

As all other special grounds of the amended motion for new trial are merely an elaboration of the general grounds, they will be treated together. The trial judge sitting without a jury was authorized from the facts to reach the following conclusions: (1) that a relationship of bailment for hire existed between the plaintiff and the defendant, (2) that this bailment obligation was breached by the defendant’s-failure to use ordi nary care to safeguard plaintiff’s airplane. The plaintiff testified that he notified the agents of the defendant not…