Legal Opinion

Monticello Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Powell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 1949No. 4-8910Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Justice.

John Powell sued Monticello Cotton Mills (hereinafter called Monticello) for damages and also for specific performance of a contract of employment. From the decree allowing damages, Monticello has appealed; and from the decree refusing specific performance, Powell has appealed.

FACTS ■

Monticello (defendant below and appellant here) is a corporation, and, in the operation of its cotton mill, it employs a large number of people. John Powell (plaintiff below and appellee here) was an employee of Monticello, being a doffer, as that term is known in cotton mill parlance. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  2. Petty v. Missouri & Arkansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Fulkerson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Ashley, Drew & Northern Railway Co. v. Baggott & BoydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API