Legal Opinion

Aguiar v. Executive Office of United States Attorneys

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 27, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2018-2823Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHAN AGUIAR, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-02823 (CJN) EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF U.S. ATTORNEYS, Defendant. ORDER The government has moved for summary judgment in this Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case, see generally Def.’s Mot. for Summ. J., ECF No. 14, while Plaintiff Stephan Aguiar, proceeding pro se, has filed a Motion to Award Costs, see generally Pl.’s Mot. to Award Costs (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 22. In his Motion, Aguiar states that he “has decided not to oppose the [government’s] Summary Judgment motion.” Pl.’s Mot.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice, (Two Cases). Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Brayton v. Office of United States Trade RepresentativeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  3. Public Citizen Health Research Group v. Dr. Frank Young, Commissioner, Food and Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  4. Summers v. Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. Grand Canyon Trust v. David BernhardtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API