Legal Opinion
E. I. DuPont De Nemours Powder Co. v. United Zinc & Chemical Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 24, 1914PublishedCited by 11 opinions
On defendant’s rale to show canse.
1Opinion of the Court
*417The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
In this as in most cases the difficulty lies not in the principles of law, hut in the analysis of the facts. The powder company desired a supply for the calendar year 1909 of what was called mixed acid for its Ashburn works. It made a written contract with the chemical company, the defendant, to supply the acid for that year. To quote the language of the contract, “the seller agrees to -and does sell to the buyer and the buyer agrees to and does purchase from the seller, not loss than two thousand tons and not more than three thousand tons of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Magnet Resources v. Summit MRI, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Chess & Wymond Co. v. La Crosse Box Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
- Crystal Paper Co. v. Robertson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Kieckhefer Box Co. v. John Strange Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Gedanke v. Wisconsin Evaporated Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.