Legal Opinion
Aes Corp. v. The Dow Chemical Company Dynegy Power Corporation F/k/a Destec Energy Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 14, 2003No. 01-3373Published
1Opinion of the Court
325 F.3d 174
AES CORP., Appellant
v.
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY; Dynegy Power Corporation f/k/a Destec Energy Inc.
No. 01-3373.
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Argued May 23, 2002.
Filed April 14, 2003.
Dennis E. Glazer, James W.B. Benkard (Argued), Frances E. Bivens, Davis, Polk & Wardwell, New York, and Michael D. Goldman, Stephen C. Norman, Potter, Anderson & Corroon, Wilmington, for Appellant.
Herbert L. Zarov, Michele L. Odorizzi (Argued), Daniel J. Delaney, Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw, Chicago, and David C. McBride, John W. Shaw, Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor, Wilmington, for…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harsco Corp. v. SeguiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- George Semerenko v. Cendant Corp. Walter A. Forbes E. Kirk Shelton Cosmo Corigliano Christopher K. McLeod Ernst & Young LLP George Semerenko, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, P. Schoenfeld Asset Management Llc, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cendant Corp. Walter A. Forbes E. Kirk Shelton Cosmo Corigliano Christopher K. McLeod Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,623 Eckart R. Straub v. Vaisman and Company, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.