Bollinger v. Gallagher
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 175, July T., 1893, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. York Co., April T., 1889, No. 12, on verdict for defendants, John Gallagher and John P. Johns. Trespass for wrongful levy, etc. Before Latimer, P. J. At the trial it appeared that' the property in dispute was a mule, a horse and a saddle and two..bridles. This property had formerly belonged to George Bollinger, plaintiff’s husband.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 175, July T., 1893, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. York Co., April T., 1889, No. 12, on verdict for defendants, John Gallagher and John P. Johns. Trespass for wrongful levy, etc. Before Latimer, P. J. At the trial it appeared that' the property in dispute was a mule, a horse and a saddle and two..bridles. This property had formerly belonged to George Bollinger, plaintiff’s husband. In 1887, under an execution against Bollinger, the property was sold in Maryland, and purchased by his wife, who gave therefor a note signed by herself, by her husband and,by Jacob Bollinger and…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mb. Justice Williams,
This case was in this court in 1891, and may be found reported in 144 Pa. 205. The principal questions then raised *250were, first, whether the attachment proceedings begun by Johns, before P,. S.'Bowman, Esq., against George Bollinger, were sufficient to support a seizure and sale of Bollinger’s goods-; second, whether, if they were sufficient'as against the defendant therein, the plaintiff, who was the wife of George Bollinger, was bound to show a title in herself good'against her husband’s creditors to entitle her to recover; and, third, whether in the absence of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rauton v. the Pullman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- Spaeth v. KounsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915