Legal Opinion

Leake v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 6, 1917No. 1183PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHuff, C. J.

This action was originally instituted by the city of Dallas against Sam A. Leake, B. F. Word, and William Charl-ton, on the 20th day of August, 1915, for taxes assessed against a certain lot described in the petition, for the year 1895, and was assessed to Margaret Hamilton and C. A. Sullivan, as the owners of the lot at that time. At the institution of the suit the lot was own-’ ed in part by the above-named defendants, appellants here. The parties so named answered, alleging that one-sixth of the lot was then owned by Fhnnie Henderson, Geo. Sory, O. R. Charlton, and S. A. Charlton. Tire…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  2. City of San Antonio v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Storrie v. CortesTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Slaughter v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Ash's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. Freestone CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Dallas County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 6 v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Freestone County v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Griffin v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API