Legal Opinion

Pharr v. Chicago Transit Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 1984No. 83-100PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McGLOON

Plaintiff Leila Pharr appeals from orders directing a verdict in favor of defendant Chicago Transit Authority and denying her motion for a new trial. On appeal, plaintiff contends (1) the evidence presented questions of fact which precluded the entry of the directed verdict; (2) the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion for substitution of judges; and (3) the trial court erred in denying plaintiff’s motion to reopen her case to call another eyewitness.

We reverse and remand.

On January 18, 1977, plaintiff Leila Pharr, administrator of the estate of Bessie Levy, filed a wrongful death…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pedrick v. Peoria & Eastern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Greene v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  3. Frisch Contracting Service Corp. v. Northern Illinois Gas Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Lode v. MercanioAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Loring v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. Farwell Tower Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  2. Skelton v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Pharr v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Serritos v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Crutchfield v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API