Legal Opinion

Romano v. Greenwald

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a controversy submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, pursuant to sections 546 and 547 of the Civil Practice Act, judgment unanimously directed in favor of the plaintiff (vendor) against the defendant (vendee) for the specific performance of the contract for the sale of real estate, without costs. Under the terms of the contract, the vendee agreed to take title subject to restrictions mentioned in a certain deed. These restrictions read as follows: “ Subject, however, to the following conditions and restrictions, which shall be covenants running with the land. That the manufacture,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kitching v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Madison Avenue Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Friedman v. New York Central RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Goldstein v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  5. Goldstein v. . RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Perrin v. Bayville Village BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Kress v. West Side Tennis ClubNew York Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API