Legal Opinion
Chapman v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 28, 1993PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMercure, J.
Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims vBell, J.), entered September 5, 1991, which denied the State’s motion to, inter alia, preclude claimants from offering expert testimony at trial.
Claimants brought this action to recover for injuries claimant Arnold G. Chapman is alleged to have suffered at the hands of State Police personnel. The State made a discovery demand, inter alia, for a statement of each person whom claimants expected to call as an expert witness at trial, "along with the subject matter, in reasonable detail, on which each expert is expected to testify, the substance of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jasopersaud v. Tao Gyoun RhoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Brossoit v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Saar v. Brown & Odabashian, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1988
3Cited by16 opinions
- Valentine v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Norton v. NguyenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Qian v. DuganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Chapman v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Rivera v. Montefiore Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.