Legal Opinion

John Fulton v. Robert Bartik, et al.; Anthony Mitchell v. Robert Bartik, et al.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 19, 2026No. 1:20-cv-03119Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN FULTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. 20 C 3118 ROBERT BARTIK, et al., ) Judge Joan H. Lefkow ) Defendants. ) ANTHONY MITCHELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. 20 C 3119 ROBERT BARTIK, et al., ) Judge Joan H. Lefkow ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the court is plaintiffs’ petition for attorneys’ fees under

42 U.S.C. § 1988

and for costs under

28 U.S.C. § 1920

and 42 U.S.C. § 1988. (Dkt. 548.)1 For the reasons stated herein, the court awards plaintiffs2 $4,167,771.00 in attorneys’ fees to be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Sandra L. Waldridge v. American Hoechst Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API