Higginbotham v. State
Texas Supreme Court
. Appeal from Rusk. Tried below before the Hon. Charles A. Frazer. The facts are sufficiently apparent from the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
The defendant was found guilty of an aggravated assault. The grounds of error relied on, are:—1st. The court erred in the charge to the jury. 2d. The jury found the defendant guilty, contrary to the evidence. The portion of the charge objected to, is in relation to the attempt to shoot.
The code provides, that “ any attempt to commit a battery, *575or any threatening gesture, showing in itself, or by words accompanying it, an immediate intention, coupled with an ability, to commit a battery, is an assault. (Art. 475.)
In the application of this definition to the facts of the case, the court…
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Johnson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
- Mooring v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Burton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878
- Cato v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1878
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.