Arnold v. Beemer Haus LLC
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Gregory Arnold, No. CV-21-01450-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Beemer Haus LLC, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss this Action 16 with Prejudice. (Doc. 17.) Defendants responded and—in the same document—moved 17 for Rule 11 sanctions. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff responded to Defendant’s Rule 11 Motion. 18 (Doc. 18.) Having considered the parties’ briefing and relevant case law, the Court will 19 grant Plaintiff’s Motion and deny Defendant’s for reasons…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. LenchesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Barber v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BergDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1999