Legal Opinion

Nussdorf v. Howell

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1974Published

1Opinion of the CourtLeonard L. Fine, J.

This is a motion by plaintiff in Action No. 2 to examine the plaintiffs in Action No. 1. In a joint trial ordered previously by the court, the moving party is not a coplaintiff with the afore-mentioned plaintiffs nor is there any connection between them in this action other than that the actions are to be jointly -tried.

*802CPLR 3101 (subd. [a], par. [4]) permits the examination of ‘ ‘ any person where the court on motion determines that there are adequate special circumstances.” Under the cases and rulings made in regard to this question, it would appear .that -a party to an action may examine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johansen v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Rudolph v. Bowling Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lombardo v. PecoraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API