Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 2013No. 118C801PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

1 In this sexual assault case, we hold that trial courts have no obligation to determine that evidence of other acts offered under CRE 404(b) and section 16-10-8301, C.R.S. (2013), satisfies the doctrine of chances to also satisfy the second and third prongs of the four-part admissibility test articulated in People v. Spoto, 795 P.2d 1314, 1318 (Colo.1990). Although the doctrine of chances provides one theory pursuant to which other acts evidence may satisfy these two components of the Spoto analysis, trial courts have discretion to assess the relevance of other acts evidence under Spoto…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. SpotoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  2. People v. RathSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Yusem v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. State v. BalfourOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. MartinezColorado Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bondsteel v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. Brooke E. Rojas v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022
  3. People v. CurtisColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. v. HamiltonColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. 20SC399 - Rojas v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API