Legal Opinion

Davis-Eisenhart Marketing Co. v. Baysden

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1995No. 94-988PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

In 1992, when Eisenhart and Associates of Des Moines and Davis Marketing Company, Inc. (both food brokers) proposed to merge the two corporations, Roger Baysden was a shareholder in one of the corporations. He dissented from the proposed merger and thereby put in motion the procedures of Iowa Code section 490.1330 (1993) to value his interest for buy out purposes. When the parties could not agree on a price, Eisenhart Marketing Company filed an action under Iowa Code section 490.1330 to determine the “fair value” of the stock. The district court set the value of Baysden’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Citizens Savings Bank v. Sac City State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Cookies Food Products, Inc. v. Lakes Warehouse Distributing, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  5. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. KasterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Crookham v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Patsy C. Albert, in Her Capacity as the Trustee of the Patsy C. Albert Revocable Trust v. Delbert Conger and Ruth CongerCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2016
  4. Security State Bank, Hartley v. ZiegeldorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  5. Sieg Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API