Legal Opinion

Burlingame v. B. E. Taylor Realty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1929No. Docket No. 136, Calendar No. 34,258PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, C. J.

On the 23d of July, 1926, the plaintiffs herein entered into a contract to purchase from the defendant B. E. Taylor Realty Company, a Michigan corporation, lot 65 of B. E. Taylor’s Grand River-Telegraph subdivision, located in Redford township, Wayne county, Michigan. The defendants Arthur L. Francis and Samuel Horrocks acted as agents for the realty company in this transaction. The bill of complaint herein is filed for the purpose of securing cancellation of the above-mentioned contract and the repayment of $675 which plaintiffs had paid thereon. This relief is sought on the ground that the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schnitz v. Grand River Avenue Development Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lewis v. Glen Eden Development Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. City Investment Co. v. WeatherwaxMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Warren v. Hugo Scherer Estate, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API