Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Discipline of Pier

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1991No. 17413-FEHPublished

1DissentAmundson, Justice

I dissent.

The facts and the law in this case are not in dispute. Respondent has admitted that he converted his client’s funds for maintaining the life style he and his wife had become accustomed to during their marriage. It is also evident this act was committed by respondent during a time in his life when his marriage was proceeding through troubled waters.

There is no question an act of this nature is a serious matter which warrants sanction. Where I part company with the majority is on what constitutes an appropriate discipline under the facts of this particular case. The Nebraska Supreme…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of StantonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re the Discipline of RudeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Matter of Discipline of SimpsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Matter of Discipline of KirbySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API