Legal Opinion

Conley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 19, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, C. J.

L. A. Conley prosecutes this appeal to reverse a judgment of conviction against him for the statutory crime of possessing a still.

The first assignment of error is that the evidence is not legally sufficient to support the verdict. According to the evidence for the State, two Federal prohibition agents met L. A. Conley and his wife on the main road, just before they got to Boyd, in Miller County, Arkansas. It was late in the evening, and the Conleys were going towards home. There had been no other cars along the road, and the prohibition agents backtracked the car of the Conleys, or followed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jin Fuey Moy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Bost v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Woodward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  4. Padgett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Osburne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Blevins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  4. Lolla v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  5. Robison v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API