Legal Opinion
Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View Associates
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 12, 2005No. AC 24558PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
This case raises a very important question, namely, whether the opening and reentry of a judgment of strict foreclosure, while the original judgment is on appeal and an appellate stay is in place, renders the appeal from the original judgment moot. Because we are constrained by our Supreme Court’s construction of Practice Book § 61-11 (formerly § 366), as explained in Milford Trust Co. v. Greenberg, 137 Conn. 277, 278-79, 77 A.2d 80 (1950), we answer that question in the affirmative, 1 mindful that it is not within the province of an intermediate appellate court to overrule…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Pavliscak v. Bridgeport HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. OteroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Milford Trust Co. v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- RAL Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. PowellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.