Legal Opinion

Yuni v. Herscovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 16, 1942Published

1DissentMartin, P. J.

The giving of a check may be regarded as payment in the popular sense. In the strict legal sense, however, in the absence of an agreement to accept the same as payment, a check is not a discharge of a debt. (Cromwell v. Lovett, 1 N. Y. Super. Ct. [1 Hall] 56; Hunter v. Wetsell, 84 N.Y. 549; 48 C. J. 617; Liberty National Bank v. Simpson, 187 Okla. 274; 102 P. [2d] 844; Cohen’s Department Stores, Inc., v. Siegel, 60 Ga. App. 79; 2 S. E. [2d] 762.)

The check in the case at bar had been certified. Had it been certified at plaintiff’s request the defendant’s obligation to pay the interest would…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunter v. . WetsellNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Cohen's Department Stores Inc. v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Liberty National Bank v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Cullinan v. Union Surety & Guaranty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API