State v. Schurz
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Lyon county to recover $8,800 on a promissory note.' The facts are stated in the opinion. Plaintiff’s motion to strike out from defendant’s answer the allegations quoted at the beginning of the opinion, and for judgment on the pleadings, was granted, Clague, J. From the order striking out that portion of the answer and granting judgment on the pleadings, defendants appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
During the years 1917 and 1918, the defendant Charles Sehurz was engaged in the implement business at Amiret, this state, during which time he handled farm machinery and binding twine manufactured at the state prison. In October, 1917, he entered into a contract with the warden of the prison to purchase 40,000 pounds of binding twine for the season of 1918, and to pay cash or give .a satisfactory note therefor due November 1, 1918, without interest, prior to the shipping of the twine. On May 2, 1918, defendants executed their joint promissory note therefor, payable to C. S. Reed as warden, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Young v. HolgateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. BarenfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Town of GrantsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Jacobson v. Rauenhorst CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. BucholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.