Legal Opinion
Biag v. King George - J&J Worldwide Services LLC
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 22, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00307Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ARTURO S. BIAG, in a Case No. 20-cv-307-BAS-DEB 12 representative capacity only and on behalf of other members of the public ORDER GRANTING 13 similarly situated, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND 14 Plaintiff, [ECF No. 8] 15 v. 16 KING GEORGE – J&J WORLDWIDE SERVICES LLC; and 17 DOES 1-10, 18 Defendant. 19 20 In February 2019, Plaintiff Arturo Biag filed a Complaint against Defendant 21 King George – J&J Worldwide Services, LLC in California state court. (ECF No. 1- 22 3 (“Compl.”).) The original Complaint…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.