Legal Opinion

Andujar v. Hani

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 16, 1921No. 32PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. . Action at law by Anthony Andujar against Jean Hani.

1Opinion of the Court

HOUGH, Circuit Judge.

This writ raises no point of pure law, but questions the application made by the trial judge of a plain legal rule to a set of facts fully proven or admitted. The rule of law is that the interpretation or construction of written documents is for the court, and the substance of the assignments of error insisted on is, first, that the court erred in finding any ambiguity in certain writings *63cet forth and admitted in the pleadings; and, second, in holding, even niter erroneously admitting other written communications between the parties, that no contract had been made,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bijur Motor Lighting Co. v. Eclipse Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Collins v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
  3. First Nat. Bank of Litchfield v. Pipe & Contractors' Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. United States v. Two BasketsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. In re Pierce, Butler & Pierce Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API