Legal Opinion
United States v. Peake
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 23, 2017No. 16-2356PPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Defendant-appellant Frank Peake, smarting under the double sting of his conviction for antitrust conspiracy and this court’s affirmance of that conviction, asked the district court to wipe the slate clean and grant him a new trial based on freshly discovered evidence. The district court dé-murred. Peake appeals. After careful consideration, we affirm the judgment below.
I. BACKGROUND
We sketch' the facts, mindful that the reader who hungers for more exegetic detail may consult our earlier opinion affirming the underlying conviction and the district court’s thoughtful…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Rivera-CarrasquilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Laureano-SalgadoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. LindseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2021
- United States v. KanodiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- BioPoint, Inc. v. DickhautCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.