Legal Opinion

Township Commissioners v. Charleston, S.C., Mining & Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 25, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Before DanTzeEr, J., Charleston, March, 1906. Action by C. C. Pinckney, E. T. Legare and John Bran-non, Township Commissioners of St. Andrew’s Parish, and W. P. Cantrell, County Supervisor of Charleston.

Read the full summary

Before DanTzeEr, J., Charleston, March, 1906. Action by C. C. Pinckney, E. T. Legare and John Bran-non, Township Commissioners of St. Andrew’s Parish, and W. P. Cantrell, County Supervisor of Charleston. County, against Charleston, S. C., Mining and Manufacturing Co. From judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. cites: Commissioners have jurisdiction of all public roads: 33 Stat., 998; Code 1903, 1849; 3 Hill, 89, 641; Elliott on Roads, 331, 337, 343, 347, 447, 483, 507. Use to acquire right of way over unenclosed woodland must be adverse: 3 Strob., 60; 54 S. C., 394; 1 Spear, 30; 1 McM.,…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The complaint alleges, that in St. Andrew’s Parish, County of Charleston, there is a certain road, extending from a point on the Bear Swamp road, to the Ashley River road, which is and has been for over twenty years used and worked as a public highway; that the defendant intends to obstruct and destroy said road as a highway, by digging and mining it with dredges, and prays for an injunction.

The defendant sets up in its answer, that the road was not a public road, that it was a mere cart road, running through the unenclosed woodland of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  2. State v. RodmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. State v. DodenhoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  4. State v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API