Legal Opinion

People v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1924No. Crim. No. 809PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

In appropriate language the indictment charges the defendant with the offense of maintaining “a place where intoxicating liquor was sold, kept and bartered” in violation of law. He was convicted and this appeal is from the "judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.

In the month of April, 1924, the defendant conducted a pool-room at the place stated in the indictment.' Adjoining his place of business was a building with a flat roof, the walls of the building extending eighteen inches or more above the roof. This adjoining building was unoccupied, except that church services…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. PassafiumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KnightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. People v. MarvichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API