Legal Opinion

United States v. The City of New York

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 3, 1956No. 23894_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant claims (1) that there was insufficient admissible evidence to prove that warrants had been issued and notice of the sale given; (2) that even if such facts were proved, the court below erred in holding that they established compliance with the statutory requirements for proceedings on distraint by the Government; and (3) that even if compliance with the statutory requirements were established, the deeds conveyed only the title held by the taxpayer on December 17, 1942 and, hence, the property was still subject to the defendant’s liens attaching prior to that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAndrews v. BelknapCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  2. Margiotta v. District Director of Internal Revenue, Brooklyn, N.Y.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Cobb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crow v. Wyoming Timber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. United States v. Max Herman, and Joseph Harris and Sadie Schwartz,defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Howell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  4. Crow v. Wyoming Timber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  5. National Bank & Trust Co. of South Bend v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API