Town of Ruston v. Wingard
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
The issue presented here is relatively simple, i.e., has Leo L. Wingard served two thirty-day sentences in the Pierce county jail and the additional time requisite to pay a fine and costs amounting to $241.40 (or $211.40)? This would seem to be a question of fact, but there are some legal facets.
In consequence of Mr. Wingard’s operation of a junk yard, he was convicted in police court of doing business without a license and of violating the zoning ordinance of the town of Ruston. Both convictions were appealed to the superior court, and the cases were consolidated for trial. On a jury verdict…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Hodges v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Ex Rel. Dillehay v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1966