Legal Opinion

Town of Ruston v. Wingard

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1961No. 35750PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

The issue presented here is relatively simple, i.e., has Leo L. Wingard served two thirty-day sentences in the Pierce county jail and the additional time requisite to pay a fine and costs amounting to $241.40 (or $211.40)? This would seem to be a question of fact, but there are some legal facets.

In consequence of Mr. Wingard’s operation of a junk yard, he was convicted in police court of doing business without a license and of violating the zoning ordinance of the town of Ruston. Both convictions were appealed to the superior court, and the cases were consolidated for trial. On a jury verdict…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hodges v. LawrenceWashington Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Dillehay v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API