Legal Opinion

Rushing v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 5, 1949No. 24215PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

The appellant was assessed a fine of $1,000.00 and sixty days in jail by a verdict of a jury upon a charge of possessing whisky for sale in a dry county.

The record brings to this Court evidence of quite unusual procedure in the trial of the cáse. The statement of facts is in part in narrative form and part in question and answer form, which does not comply with the requirements of law. Sanders v. State, 157 S. W. (2d) 910; Newsom v. State, 169 S. W. (2d) 195; Williams v. State, 170 S. W. (2d) 735; Edwards v. State, 185 S. W. (2d) 111; Davis v. State, 197 S. W. (2d) 108;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lamkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  5. Canova v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southwest Industrial Import & Export, Inc. v. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API