Legal Opinion
Bozeman Deaconess Foundation v. Ford
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 23, 1968No. 11257PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHonorable Charles Luedke, District Judge
sitting in place of MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON, delivered the Opinion of the Court.
By this action Bozeman Deaconess Foundation, as owner and operator of Hillcrest Homes, a home for the aged, sought recovery of 1965 taxes assessed on approximately 21 acres of land occupied and used by that facility. Such taxes were paid under protest and in response to timely action taken, the district court gave judgment in favor of the Foundation, ordering refund of $12,825.85 and enjoining the assessment and collection of taxes in the future. The basis of the district court decision was that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cruse v. FischlMontana Supreme Court · 1918
- Fredericka Home for the Aged v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Topeka Presbyterian Manor, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
- Validity of Claim of Assembly Homes, Inc. v. Yellow Medicine CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Town of Cascade v. County of CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- The Presbyterian Homes v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- United Presbyterian Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Evangelical Retirement Homes of Greater St. Louis, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State Bd. of Tax Comm. v. Methodist Home for AgedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Milwaukee Protestant Home for the Aged v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.