Legal Opinion

Voorhes v. Dempsey

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided June 22, 1964No. 10462PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Three Connecticut voters, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, bring this action under the Civil Rights Acts, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1988 and 1988, and 28 U.S.C. § 1343, to enjoin the operation of Connecticut voting machines equipped with a mandatory party lever and to have Section 9-242 of the Connecticut General Statutes (1958 Rev.), which requires that the machines be so equipped, declared unconstitutional. The defendants, the Governor and Secretary of the State of Connecticut, have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. MacDougall v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Voltaggio v. CaputoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1963
  4. Smith v. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  5. Johnson v. ClarkDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1938

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Harley McLain v. Ben Meier, Secretary of State and Allen Olson, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Nader v. SchafferDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1976
  3. Gilhool v. Chairman & Com'rs, Philadelphia Co. Bd. of Elec.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. New York State Democratic Party v. LomenzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Tansley v. GrassoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API