Bass v. Baskowitz

The defendant is a nonresident of the state, and this is an action to bring him into court by process of attachment. Code Prac. art; 240.

But the oath requisite to obtain the attachment was not sworn to by the plaintiff, al though present in the parish, hut only hy his attorney. Cf.-Code Prae. art. 217. ■ ;

Accordingly, defendant moved to dissolve the injunction on said ground..

I

£1] We think the attachment was properly dissolved. Act No. 27 of 1926, the pleading and practice act, is identical with.Act No. 300 of 1914. See Ducre v. Bagur, 165 La. 307, 115 So. 572. And in Porteau v. Gluck, 149…