Legal Opinion
Falk v. Krumm
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William R. Brennan, Jr., J.
In this action a real estate broker seeks to recover $7,000 in commissions from the defendants, husband and wife, former owners of real property by the *449entirety, on the theory that he produced a purchaser ready, able and willing to purchase the property upon terms fixed by the sellers. The husband has defaulted in appearance at trial and prior to trial his attorney was granted leave to withdraw from further representation of said defendant. As to him the trial has constituted an inquest. The wife has contested the action through her own attorney. She claims that she…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moses v. CarverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Moses v. CarverNew York Supreme Court · 1937
- Fanning v. MaggiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Hayden v. PostCity of New York Municipal Court · 1895
3Cited by7 opinions
- Abraham & Straus v. Francis (In Re Francis)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Hamilton v. PicardoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Estate of MorgartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
- Schwartz v. Bankers Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
- HAMILTON, ELIJAH v. PICARDO, GEORGEAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.